For example, for any information you need to know about using Clonezilla Live, check out the Clonezilla Live Docs. The good part about Clonezilla, though, is that any information you need will be clearly laid out in the documentation. The outdated terminal design only complicates things – even if Clonezilla had to stick to a terminal non-graphical design, it could still improve and modernize it. To someone not used to using command line operations, though, or for someone not used to Linux file systems and terminology, Clonezilla can quickly become confusing and disorienting. Overall, for the novice user, Macrium’s user interface is a lot friendlier and easier to navigate than Clonezilla’s user interface.Īlso Read: Best Synctoy Alternatives Macrium vs Clonezilla: Ease of Use Clonezillaįor an IT technician or Linux user, using Clonezilla won’t pose much of an issue – especially when only dealing with the basic functions. There are also enhanced toolbar options and fonts, and options are clearly marked and often accompanied by icons that help you understand what they are about. Macrium vs Clonezilla: Open Source Clonezilla For example, I’ll explain more about incremental backup, being that it is a feature only available on Macrium and not on Clonezilla. Over the course of this article, I’m going to go a bit more into detail about some of these features. Bare metal restore to dissimilar hardware.
Backup and recovery on a file/folder level.Some features of the premium commercial license include: Bare metal restore to dissimilar hardware (restore a computer to a new machine that is blank without an OS or apps).
Some features of the individual premium license include:
Some features of Macrium Reflect Free include:
0 kommentar(er)
